Blogger @ Janna Syariza

Tertarik dengan perkembangan kes liwat anwar ibrahim, saya cuba mengenali dengan lebih dekat profil saudara Saiful Bukhari. saya dapat rasakan semua pembaca menerima byk bahan bacaan yang sama, terutamanya berkaitan dengan komen keluarga,kawan serta tunangnya.

Cuma yang menariknya saya melihat tunang saudara saiful mungkin hanya "aktif" menjadi blogger setelah tunangya mendedahkan kejadian yang berlaku. Saya agak musykil kerana blog ini hanya didafatarkan pada June 2008 dan posting yang pertama pada 30 June 2008 iaitu sehari selepas kes ini diumumkan oleh media. Mungkin saya terlepas pandang pada blog Janna yang lain tapi pautan blog ini menjadi platform yang utama bagi pelayar internet membaca bagaiman Janna menyampaikan pendiriaanya. Persoalan yang menarik disini adakah blog ini telah siap disediakan terlebih dahulu dan menanti untuk mensensasikan lagi isu ini ataupun sememangnya luahan perasaanya semata-mata. Kalau Janna menulis berdasarkan perasaan dan pedirianya terhadap isu ini.. well i have to salute u janna...cool and calm. Still ada masa untuk create blog dan menulis rasa hati. Uncle Pat pulak masih boleh tersenyum lebar dengan reporters..Saya cuma hairan melihat senario seperti ini dari segi psikologi seorang manusia normal sekiranya menerima sesuatu musibah yang tak terjangka. Tidak perlu saya ulas panjang dengan lebih lanjut lagi. Bak kata Nabil... Lu pikirlah sendiri....l u tengoklah sendiri....

Read More

Tilam mana pula bakal diusung kali ini!

NAMPAKNYA kejutan yang dibuat Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan seumpama bom jangka. Ia berjaya diletupkan dengan hasrat menenggelamkan isu-isu yang berlingkar di kaki pemimpin Umno.

Saiful berjaya menyingkir seketika isu Altantuya dan Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor yang diyakini Raja Petra Kamaruddin melalui akuan sumpahnya.
Masyarakat juga seperti sudah lupa isu Datuk Yong Teck Lee dan Parti Maju Sabah. Isu usul tidak percaya berjaya mengundahkan Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi seperti berlalu begitu sahaja.

Begitu juga dengan isu Ketua Pemuda MIC, S A Vigneswaran keluar parti, seperti ditenggelamkan. Sepatutnya isu itu berada di helaian depan bukannya belakang.
Taufan membadai rumah tangga Umno seakan terhenti seketika. Biar pun sudah ada atap yang terbang dan dinding tercabut, namun mahligai usang Umno masih lagi bertahan.
Barisan pertahanannya kini dilihat banyak bergantung kepada pasukan polis dan Peguam Negara. Sedangkan polis masih gagal mencari pembunuh Nurin Jazlan dan adik Sharlinie Mohd Nashar, 5 yang hilang.
..»»Baca lagi

Nampaknya organisasi itu lebih serasi menjadi benteng mempertahankan kerajaan BN.
Polis ternyata lebih cepat bertindak sehingga Suwandi dan Azman ditembak dengan peluru hidup ketika menyertai perhimpunan di Kuala Terengganu, tahun lalu.
Bukan sekadar nyawa hampir melayang, sebaliknya mereka ditahan pula di Penjara Marang tanpa dibolehkan ikat jamin pada awalnya.

Inilah wajah polis dan pihak pendakwaan di Malaysia. Maka nampaknya sukarlah Pakatan Rakyat menduduki Putrajaya selagi dua badan terbabit terus dengan sifat biasnya.
Mengambil kira situasi yang berlaku sekarang, siapa sebenar yang mencipta skrip terbaru sehingga berjaya menggegarkan negara. Berbahagialah orang berkenaan dalam sehari dua ini. Ada pihak menyarankan orang berkenaan diberi anugerah tertinggi di kurun ini. Skripnya benar-benar laku sehingga memenuhi halaman akhbar dan ruang televisyen.

Ada pihak berhujah Anwar sendiri, kononnya mahu mengangkat lagi martabat dirinya, sebelum menduduki kerusi empuk di Putrajaya. Waraskah hujah sedemikian.
Tengoklah kenyataan menantu Perdana Menteri, Khairy Jamaluddin dan Ketua Pemuda Umno, Datuk Seri Hishamuddin Hussien. Seperti kata Khairy, Anwar seorang ahli politik yang kreatif dalam meraihkan simpati masyarakat. Hishamuddin pula mendakwa tindakan Anwar mahu mengalih tumpuan, sama seperti yang dilakunya ketika dituduh suatu ketika dahulu.

Pada 1998 tuduhan sama dilempar terhadap Anwar sebagai asas pemecatannya daripada jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri. Ia menjadi sketsa politik yang paling hangat ketika itu.
Tiada negara di rantau Asean lain ditimpa dengan pertuduhan yang amat mengaibkan semata-mata mahu musnah rakan sendiri. Di negara jiran, biar pun sering bergolak, namun tidak pernah kedengaran teori liwat dijadikan sebagai senjata, melumpuhkan kubu lawan.

Apa dah jadi dengan penulis buku Khalid Jefri yang memulakan cerita mengaibkan Anwar.Hari ini penulis buku itu sedang berdepan dengan penghakiman di alam kubur.
Anwar ketika itu dikaitkan dengan empat kes liwat membabitkan bekas pensyarah, Hairany Mohd Naffis, penulis ucapan warga Pakistan, Dr Munawar Anees, pereka fesyen, Mior Abdul Razak dan adik angkat Anwar, Sukma Darmawan Sasmitaat Madja.
Anwar ditahan atas tuduhan homoseksual.

Sepanjang perbicaraan, tiga kali pihak pendakwa meminda pertuduhan. Anwar hanya disabitkan kesalahan berdasarkan seorang saksi. Saksi tersebut dianggap berjaya memberi wajah herot kepada sistem kehakiman di negara kita. Beberapa kali menukar pengakuan seperti menjadi amalan biasa yang dihalal dalam dakwaan terpilih di Malaysia.

Orang ramai masih lagi mengingati agenda mengusung tilam ke mahkamah. Cukup mengaib dan memualkan sekali. Siapa pembantu pelakon ketika itu kalau bukan anggota polis dan pihak pendakwa.

Kemungkinan di atas kesamaran kes itu, sebaliknya Anwar disabitkan dengan kesalahan rasuah iaitu penyalahgunaan kuasa iaitu campur tangan dalam penyiasatan polis terhadap dakwaan salah laku seksual. Beliau kemudian menjalani hukuman enam tahun penjara sebelum dibebaskan oleh Mahkamah Persekutuan. Selepas enam tahun Anwar dikurung di sebalik jeriji besi maka pada 6 November 2006 mahkamah membebaskan Anwar dan Sukma.

Pihak pendakwa memberitahu mahkamah, pihaknya tidak mempunyai bukti perilaku sumbang itu. Sedangkan Anwar sudah diaibkan begitu rupa dalam tempoh begitu lama.
Keputusan itu bermakna Anwar bebas daripada hukuman penjara sembilan tahun yang dijatuhkan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur pada 2000 atas kesalahan tersebut.
Kini selepas 10 tahun kes itu berlalu, jerat yang serupa dipasang sekali lagi. Jarang panglima handal menggunakan taktik serupa berulang kali.

Kali ini bukan empat mangsa liwat yang mampu ditampilkan seperti yang berlaku pada 1998, sebaliknya hanya seorang sahaja. Mohd Saiful, 23 pemuda yang dikatakan gagal menerus pengajian di Uniten memulakan segala cerita itu. Maka tercetuslah dakwaan beliau diliwat Anwar dan menurut laporannya kali terakhir pada 26 Jun lalu di sebuah kondominium di Jalan Setia Kasih, Desa Damansara. Inilah versi cerita yang paling menarik tahun ini ketika Anwar sedang melangkah gagah ke Putrajaya,? kata Naib Presiden PAS, Datuk Husam Musa.

Seorang penyelidik, Mohd Zainal Abidin Hussien mempersoalkan siapa yang membikin skrip mengaibkan Anwar bagi kali kedua ini. Malah katanya skrip terbabit mungkin paling berjaya dalam cubaan meranapkan Anwar, biar langsung tidak terkesan.
Mungkinkah musuh-musuh Anwar yang berligar dalam kerajaan dan bekas teman karib sendiri.

Ketika ramai terpinga-pinga dengan pukulan itu, bekas Ketua Angkatan Muda KeADILan, Mohd Ezam Mohd Nor pula tiba-tiba tampil. Ahli baru Umno seumur hidup itu pula mahu orang ramai tidak termakan dengan cerita konspirasi Anwar.
Dengan mengambil alih peranan Perdana Menteri, Ezam cuba mengupas isu tersebut.

Adakah dalam situasi sekarang Ezam sudah menjadi pembantu setia Presiden Umno.
Ezam juga mulai bercakap soal agama, dengan mengatakan segala dakwaan Anwar menuduh konspirasi, bercanggah dengan ajaran Islam.
Ada orang kampung bertanya pihak yang mencipta skrip menuduh Anwar pada 1998 tidakkah bercanggah dengan Islam, kerana ia dipertahankan Ezam sehingga terpaksa merengkok dalam ISA. Bagi Setiausaha Badan Perhubungan KeADILan Kelantan, Mohd Makhatar Che Harun konspirator yang muncul kali ini mengejutkan seketika.

Inilah wajah politik desperado di Malaysia. Silapnya Anwar kerana mudah percaya budak yang tidak kenal batang hidup dibawa ke pejabat KeADILan,? ujarnya.
Dalam bahasa politik dan sosiologi disebut divide and rule. Bahasa Latin divide et impera atau divide and conquer. Umno dan BN dikatakan terpaksa menggunakan teori itu, semata-mata mahu menggagalkan Pakatan yang semakin mengesot ke Putrajaya.
Tilam mana pula bakal diusung kali ini.

Maka isu liwat biar pun ternyata pernah gagal, kini menjadi senjata ampuh. Bagi mereka musnah karier Anwar bermakna gocanglah Pakatan.
Sedangkan pemimpin Pakatan seumpama cendawan, tumbuh merata selepas hujan

Read More

From the Office of Anwar Ibrahim: Press Statement

For immediate release

3 July 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Today we witness another episode of a consistent pattern of abuse of power and manipulation of the criminal justice system.

Recently one of the witnesses in the Altantuya trial approached us with detailed information of events connected to her disappearance and murder. The information was shocking.
Mr. P. Balasubramaniam, who was engaged by Abdul Razak Baginda as a private investigator was advised to seek legal counsel and document his story independently...»»Baca lagi

DSAI: Hubungan Altantuya dan Najib Razak

Read More

Statutory Declaration by Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal

STATUTORY DECLARATION

I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal (NRIC NO: xxxxxx-xx-6235) a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at xxxxx, Selangor do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-

1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.

2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.
»»Baca lagi...

3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.

4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.
5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.

6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.

7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.

8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.

9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.

10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.

11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.
12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.

13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.
14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.
15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.

16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.

17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.
18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.
19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.
20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.
21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.
22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.

23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.

24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.

25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-
25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.
25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.
25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.
25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.

25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.

26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.

27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.
28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-
28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.
28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.
28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.
28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.
28.6That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.
28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.

30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.

31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.

32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.
33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.

34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.

35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.

36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.

37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.

38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 - 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.

39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.

40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.

41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.

42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.

43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.

44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.

45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.

46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.
47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.

48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.
49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.
50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- ” I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.

53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.

54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-
54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.

54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.
54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.

SUBCRIBED and solemnly )

declared by the abovenamed )

Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]

this day of 2008 )
Before me,

………………………………….
Commissioner for Oath
Kuala Lumpur

Read More

Dua Laporan Polis Dibuat Atas Cubaan Meliwat Oleh Pegawai Polis Berpangkat DSP

Kuala Terengganu - Dua anggota polis berpangkat konstabel telah membuat laporan polis kerana tidak puas tindak tanduk orang atasan yang juga ketua mereka, seorang pegawai polis berpangkat DSP yang bertugas sebagai ketua balai di satu daerah luar bandar di Terengganu. (Kemaskini)

Kedua-dua laporan yang dibuat mengadu bahawa kedua-dua konstabel tersebut telah cuba di cabul dengan 'dipeluk dan dicium' dan cuba di liwat..»»Baca lagi

Read More